“ would you mind if i smoked?” b:

     

I feel the need to make it clear that the intended context for the OP is what you normally would expect, i.e., a question coming from a smoker who"d lượt thích to smoke at the time of speaking. Somehow I feel that this type of question is not to lớn be lumped together with a hypothetical question where the speaker does not necessarily intend to smoke at the time of speaking.

Bạn đang xem: “ would you mind if i smoked?” b:


conditionals would
mô tả
Improve this question
Follow
edited Jun 9, 2019 at 18:06
*

tchrist♦
128k4848 gold badges355355 silver badges548548 bronze badges
asked Jan 1, 2015 at 19:17
*

JK2JK2
4,71755 gold badges4343 silver badges9696 bronze badges
4
showroom a phản hồi |

3 Answers 3


Sorted by: Reset to mặc định
Highest score (default) Date modified (newest first) Date created (oldest first)
2
Yes, it"s interrogative và conditional, with the condition given in the "if…" clause (protasis) and potential consequence in the first clause (apodosis) và inversion ("would you" instead of "you would") khổng lồ make it a question asking if this conditional is indeed the case.

To answer questions from the comments:

If it"s a conditional, then how come it"s not as idiomatic lớn say "If I smoked here, would you mind?"

"Would you mind…" makes it more immediately clear that you are starting a question, "If I smoked here, would you mind?" remains valid too though, và also interrogative and conditional, but making it clear from the beginning that one is asking a question is often an advantage.

Also, how come it"s also allowed to say "Would you mind if I smoke here?"

It"s normal with this sort of conditional lớn use the past tense. Consider if we make the statement, rather than the question; "You would mind, if I smoked". This sets up a hypothetical situation ("I smoked") và then makes a statement about that depends upon it being true ("You would mind") even though it is not true (this is the counter-factual conditional form; about things that are not true, và what would be consequent upon it if it was true).

Xem thêm: 1M3 Bằng Bao Nhiêu Cm3, Mm3, 1M Khối Bằng Bao Nhiêu Cm Khối

Historically, the tense used here is in fact the past tense (simple past, as here, or past progressive) in the subjunctive mood. The subjunctive mood isn"t really distinguishable from other moods in modern american-home.com.vn for the most part, but it can be seen in the variant ("You would mind if I were lớn smoke") as the subjunctive uses "I were" rather than "I was". That said, many people ignore this now and so you might also find "I was" used here by some native speakers.

It makes a reasonable amount of sense, when one considers that it hypothesises one sự kiện coming before another; first "I smoked" and now "you mind".

And hence just as when it is not a question it is "you would mind if I smoked" (or "if I smoked, you would mind"), so as a question it is "would you mind if I smoked?" (or "if I smoked, you would mind?" or "would you mind if I were to smoke?"). The question hypothesises one event coming first ("I smoked") và then asked whether it would then be true that now "you mind".

Xem thêm: Viết Một Đoạn Văn Ngắn Kể Về Ngày Khai Trường Đáng Nhớ Của Em

All that said, you certainly will come across people using the full present-tense "would you mind if I smoke". Whether that is "correct" or not is one of those things people will disagree on.